|
“he “iconic” logo for the 2012 London Olympics was unveiled here on Monday, but critics immediately condemned it as “hideous” and a waste of money… “Lord Coe has described this logo as ‘ambitious, interactive and youth-friendly’. I would describe it as hideous,” he said… “Questions need be answered as to how we have ended up in this situation. Was there an open competition to supply the designs? If so, what on earth do the rejected ones look like! “We need to know how much money this exercise has cost, because whatever it was, it’s been a complete waste of money.” you get the idea….what do you think? do you like the logo? |
That is the 2012 London Olympic Logo. In my humble opinion, it’s pretty ugly. I’m not the only one it seems….
| ||||||||||
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
WOW!!That IS ugly! do you think they can re-design it?
It looks like they just set a 2 year old up with some cardboard and scissors. What on earth do they think all that mumbo-jumbo signifies?
I’m sure they could change it, but it would be a totally embarrassing situation.
Ugly! with a capital “U”. The 2 year old kid must be really proud of his ART.
What a waist of money they spent.
That thing is uglier then Paris Hilton
Well, unfortunately, it seems the logo will not be re-designed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6750149.stm
The Brits did not like the emblem, most probably because there is nothing related to British history and culture to make them proud of. Nationalism is evident in the graphical execution of Sydeny 2000, Athens 2004 and Beijing 2008 emblems.